X-H1 XF100-400mmF4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR + 1.4x lens 560mm f/8.0 1/500s 1250 ISO 0.0 EVĭxO seems to not suffer from the same demosaicing artifacts that LR does. still room for improvement, but much better than the results from LR. Initial test shows a nice improvement at ISO 3200 - I will have to look and see if I have anything shot at higher ISO that I actually kept.Ī re-worked X-H1 file, using DxO Photolab5 and PureRAW noise reduction. The m4/3 files respond beautifully to the DxO PureRAW processing, giving really nice, clean results at ISO 6400 and even 12800, but until now the only option for Fuji X-Trans has been Topaz DeNoise A!, which I found to be very disappointing. it should help the Fuji X series catch up to (and hopefully pass) m4/3 in high-ISO noise performance once again. But if I wanted film simulations, I would do in-camera or with Fuji software. No film simulations (or I haven't found them). Auto AWB way better than in LR (which always gives me yellowish results no matter which camera).

Colors better than in LR, in particular skin tones.

Fingers crossed.įirst impression: Seems stable, fast enough.

DxO PhotoLab 5 now with X-Trans support (beta)Įxciting.

Dxo photolab 2 elite performance